Mary Shelley's Frankstein

Thinking Task

This blog is a response to Thinking Task of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein assigned by Megha Trivedi mam, the Department of English, MKBU. In this blog I'm going to discuss about the related question of Frankenstein by Mary Shelley.

Here we begin:

Q-1 what are some major differences between the movie and the novel Frankenstein?

1 response:

There are several major differences between the movie adaptations of "Frankenstein" and Mary Shelley's original novel:

1. Characterization:

 In the novel, Victor Frankenstein is portrayed as a more complex and tormented character. His motivations and inner thoughts are explored in greater depth. In some movie adaptations, his character may be simplified or altered.

2. Creature's Appearance: 

The novel provides a detailed description of the creature as hideous and grotesque, while some movie versions depict the creature in varying ways, often with makeup and special effects that differ from the book's description.

3. Framing Narrative: 

The novel uses a framing narrative with multiple narrators, while many movies simplify the narrative structure, focusing more on Victor's perspective.

4. Creature's Intelligence: 

The creature in the novel is highly intelligent and learns to speak and read on his own. Some movie adaptations downplay this intelligence for dramatic effect.

5. Additional Characters: 

Movies may introduce new characters or omit some from the novel, altering the relationships and dynamics within the story.

6. Setting and Time Period: 

Some adaptations may update the story's setting or time period to make it more relevant to contemporary audiences.

7. Themes and Moral Implications: 

The novel explores complex themes, including the consequences of scientific ambition and societal rejection. Movie adaptations may emphasize different themes or simplify the moral dilemmas.

8. Endings: 

The novel's ending is different from various movie adaptations. Some movies opt for more dramatic or visually striking conclusions.

Conclusion:

These are just a few examples, and the degree to which these differences exist can vary widely among different film adaptations of Frankenstein.

Q-2 Who do you think a real monster?

2 response:

According to me the Creater of monster is a real monster bcoz, he means the Creater created him and he lived him alone and people and everyone is afraid of him and the monster became  also afraid  and bcoz of his weird looking people made him a bad and the evil person. And so I think as the Creater of the monster is a Creater. And he used to live alone.

Q-3 Do you think the search for knowledge is dangerous and destructive.

3 response:

The search for knowledge itself is not inherently dangerous or destructive. In fact, it's a fundamental aspect of human progress and understanding. However, the way knowledge is pursued and applied can have both positive and negative consequences. Knowledge can be used for constructive purposes, such as advancing medicine, technology, and improving society. On the other hand, it can also be misused, leading to destructive outcomes if not guided by ethical principles and a responsible approach. So, the danger and destructiveness often come from how knowledge is used rather than the act of seeking knowledge itself. It's essential for society to promote responsible and ethical practices in the pursuit and application of knowledge to minimize potential harm.

Q-4 Do you think  Victor Frankenstein's

creature was inherently  evil or did Society's rejection and mistreatment turn him into a monster? 

4 response:

Victor Frankenstein's creature, often referred to as "Frankenstein's Monster," is a complex character in Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein." Many interpretations of the story suggest that the creature was not inherently evil but was driven to commit destructive acts due to the rejection and mistreatment he experienced from society.

The novel portrays the creature as initially innocent and benevolent, but he becomes increasingly bitter and vengeful as he is repeatedly rejected and isolated by humans. It could be argued that it was the creature's experiences and the way he was treated that turned him into a "monster" in the eyes of society.

In this interpretation, the novel raises questions about the nature of evil and the role of society in shaping individuals' behavior. It's a classic example of the "nature vs. nurture" debate, suggesting that external factors and treatment can play a significant role in determining one's actions and character.

Q-5 Should there be limits on Scientific exploration? If so, what  should those limitsbe?

5 response:

Scientific exploration should have ethical and safety limits in place to ensure responsible research. These limits typically include:

1. Ethical considerations: Research should not harm humans, animals, or the environment. It should adhere to ethical standards, such as informed consent and respect for cultural and moral values.

2. Safety precautions: Researchers must prioritize safety to prevent accidents or unintended consequences. Risk assessments and safety protocols are essential.

3. Legal regulations: Compliance with laws and regulations, such as those governing bioethics, environmental protection, and intellectual property, is crucial.

4. Dual-use concerns: Scientists should be aware of the potential for their research to be used for harmful purposes, such as in the development of weapons.

5. Privacy and data protection: Personal data and privacy should be respected, with strict guidelines for data collection, storage, and sharing.

Balancing scientific freedom with these limits is a complex task, but it's necessary to ensur

We have some responsible and ethical scientific progress.

We have some more images related to it:

For further better under standing you click on the movie link given below:

https://youtu.be/5reVOf_IhN8?si=tW2qlThA3YzdatfI

Thank you for visiting!!!